Austria’s desire to have tighter control of its Muslim community, which has been manifested in a bill that seeks to change the status of Muslims, will backfire if it is implemented, experts say. Despite Austria having witnessed no terrorist ACTIVITIES perpetrated by its Muslim community, they are seeking to pass an “Islam bill” to prevent radicalism from occurring.

What looks like a preventative measure to prevent Islamic radicalism in Europe has STARTED to have unsettling consequences for the Muslim community residing in Europe. Countries in the region that are already suffering from increasing Islamophobia, are looking to implement precautions to prevent potential violence from “radical Muslims.” The latest in a series of these cautions has come from the Austrian government, which is seeking to bring changes that have been deemed to be extremely discriminatory against Muslims.

The draft bill, which seeks changes in the status of Muslims, is thought to be a precursor for regression of the rights of Muslims in the country and has prompted an angry response from the community.

The bill, which has ignited debates in the country since it first became public on Oct. 2, was suspended due to harsh reactions from Muslims who cited discrimination. It was then reopened to discussion at the constitution commission on Jan. 14. The commission accepted the bill after making some changes in accordance with the reactions of the Muslim community in Austria. Muslims, although hailing the changes, maintain numerous concerns regarding some articles that they believe are still problematic for the freedoms of Muslims.

In its current form, the bill aims to prohibit foreign FUNDING for Islamic organizations in Austria and imposes a standardized German translation of the Quran and other religious texts. It also prohibits imams from being appointed from abroad, instead making it mandatory that they receive education from the theology departments of Austrian universities. In doing so, according to experts, Austria is aiming to establish its own version of Islam. The consent for only one determined translation of Islam is an apparent sign of the government’s wish to control Islam through its own understanding of it, some believe. They also suggest the move indicates that the Quran is considered problematic by the government.

“We want an Islam with an Austrian character,” Integration Minister Sebastian Kurz had told public broadcaster ORF last October, supporting the current VIEWS that Austria wants to shape Islam with its own ideology.

Highlighting that the bill sets a bad example for Europe, Bayraklı said that taking precautions against Muslim extremism has no reasonable grounds since Austria has not been the victim of any terrorist activities.

Another article of the bill also makes it possible for the government to recognize a certain community or abolish it. The draft bill has also been criticized for including offensive and accusatory language against Muslims, which are deemed as being against the principle of equality.

The Muslim community in Austria is expected to take the bill to the constitutional court once it passes parliament. If rejected by the top court, the community will reportedly consider taking it to the European Court of Human Rights for the violation of freedom of religion.

There are about 500,000 Muslims in the country.

(Courtesy Daily Sabah)