From past personal experience, I present some thoughts on the practical repercussions of this classification in this #thread.
𝙄𝙨𝙤𝙡𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣: Israel aims to isolate these orgs and limit opportunities for interaction with the international community. Israeli encourages entities around the world to stop communicating & cooperating with the listed institutions. It also aims to damage local interaction.
𝘾𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙗𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙮: Israel aims to damage these orgs credibility, thus allowing the human rights narrative to be questioned. Any narrative issued by these institutions will remain in a non-neutral context, while many media & research centers will avoid dealing with them.
𝙁𝙞𝙣𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙚𝙢𝙗𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙤: Donor countries and organizations around the world stop providing funding to these organizations while pursuing their bank accounts, including the Palestinian ones, where their property may be subject to confiscation and prosecution.
𝙋𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙪𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣: These orgs staff are subject to arrest if Israel decides to do so according to “justifications” provided by the listing and the travel ban, which leads to staff inability to work in these institutions and prevent them from engaging in their activities.
𝙋𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙡𝙮𝙨𝙞𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙖𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙚𝙨: This classification will make it impossible to organize or document victims’ testimonies & communicate with them. The institutions cannot perform legal representation for victims, including prisoners, before the Israeli courts.
𝘿𝙚𝙘𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙚: Civil society orgs play a vital role in the resilience of societies under occupation. This classification will make individuals reluctant to form civil gatherings and force current orgs to reduce their activities and the ceiling of their anti-occupation discourse
Courtesy of @RamAbdu